ASRS
to Conduct FANS Study
- We received
a FANS message to climb to FL330 (we were at FL310). The Captain printed
the message, verified the plane number and tail flight number, but
somehow missed the phrase 'at XA40Z.' We climbed at XA28Z and reported
level at FL330. ATC advised us to return to FL310 which we immediately
did. This problem could be avoided if conditional clearances were
not given....
This ASRS report filed by
a First Officer refers to a new technology called FANS (Future Air Navigation
System) that is currently being introduced aboard commercial air carrier
aircraft such as the B-747-400. FANS enhances aircraft communications
and navigation through a data link (electronic non-voice) connection
between the aircraft Flight Management Computer (FMC) and ATC facilities.
This data link is supported by ground and satellite relay stations.
The messages relayed through
FANS data link may involve clearances, flight crew requests, route modifications,
and other types of routine and emergency communications. The FANS system
currently is being operated by several international carriers on Pacific
oceanic routes as a partial substitute for ARINC and other types of
voice communications.
NASA has asked ASRS to collect
operational experiences from pilots who have used FANS within the last
6 months. Pilots are encouraged to submit both beneficial experiences
as well as operational difficulties they have encountered with the system.
ASRS will conduct the FANS study through a number of voluntary telephone
interviews, known as structured callbacks, with participating pilots.
The information gathered
by ASRS will help NASA recommend appropriate ways to improve FANS technology,
including training, documentation, and future implementations of data
link technology.
Only reports from air carrier
pilots using the FANS system will be solicited for the study. Pilots
who submit reports to ASRS on FANS incidents and experiences will be
contacted by a telephone call to the phone number given on the ASRS
report form ID strip. Reporters who agree to participate in the study
will be able to discuss the incident they reported in detail with an
ASRS analyst, at a time that is mutually convenient.
Participation in the ASRS
study is entirely voluntary. As with all ASRS report information, all
personally identifying data (names, company affiliations, etc.) will
be deleted before the research results are given to NASA. Only aircraft
make/model information will be retained in the ASRS data. If there are
any questions that a reporter prefers not to answer, the ASRS analyst
will skip those questions.
As soon as the interview
is complete, the report ID strip will be returned to the participating
pilot, with no record of the reporter's identity retained by ASRS.
ASRS reporting forms are
available for downloading from the ASRS Web site at http://olias.arc.nasa.gov/asrs.
Forms may also be obtained from FAA Flight Standards District Offices
and Flight Service Stations; from participating air carrier companies;
or by written request to ASRS, P.O.Box 189, Moffett Field, CA, 95035-0189.
Flight
crews routinely listen for unusual noises in the aircraft, but the racket
this crew heard was never covered in any training syllabus. A First Officer
reports:
- Departed
the gate and found out that there was a [short] ground stop to our
destination. This turned out to be about 3 hours. The Flight Attendants
were doing a good job of keeping the passengers content even though
we were not making any progress towards our destination. We got word
that we could start our engines and get ready for takeoff. We had
just run up the power and started our takeoff roll when we heard loud
screaming and hollering from the back. We discontinued the takeoff
roll and advised Tower that we needed to get off the runway. Upon
exiting the runway, we checked with the Flight Attendants to see what
the problem was. Apparently the passengers were so happy to be taking
off that they all started cheering. We had no way of knowing this
at the time, of course. We then went back and got in line for departure
again. This time the takeoff roll was uneventful and we proceeded
to our destination. Most of the passengers thought it was humorous
that we would stop for the noise, but as we explained, we had no idea
what the seriousness of the problem was or could be. Just another
glamorous day in aviation.
Flight crews have come to
expect the occasional cheer on landing, but rarely hear such praise
on takeoff.
Taildragger
Tales
An
experienced taildragger pilot and former air carrier Captain sent this
report to ASRS to alert other pilots to a potential hazard that might
be detected during the preflight check of some tailwheel aircraft.
- After
a slightly tail-first touchdown in a crosswind ...the airplane tried
to weathervane. I took over [from my student] and tried to keep the
airplane straight, but with full right rudder and slight braking,
the airplane tipped over to the right, damaging the right wingtip
and right aileron, and turning the right wheel very slightly. I had
the airplane towed to the hangar for repairs. When I inspected the
tailwheel, I noticed the right spring and attachment chain were disconnected,
preventing directional control on rollout. I hope this will help make
pilots check for security and tightness of the tailwheel attachment
mechanism.
A disconnected or broken
attachment mechanism could doom a pilot to unsafe ground operations.
Another General Aviation
reporter received help from an alert airport worker about an unwelcome
addition to the tail of the airplane.
- Since
my last flight in the airplane, the mechanic added a small rudder
gust lock because the airplane is parked outside. On preflight walkaround,
I didn't see the gust lock. We taxied out to the runway and one of
the ground crew that was cutting the grass saw the gust lock, informed
the Tower, and the Tower informed us. I hadn't performed my before-takeoff
checklist yet, and I am confident that I would not have taken off
with the gust lock on the aircraft.
A brightly-colored remove-before-flight
streamer will help make gust locks, gear door pins, intake covers, and
other ground safety gadgets more noticeable on preflight.
Wandering Hands...Engine Out!
A
wise flight school owner once warned the instructors, "Do not turn
a simulated emergency into an actual one." The next reporter let
a student's wandering hands toss this advice right out the window.
- I was
conducting an aircraft checkout for [an experienced pilot for whom
English is a second language]. After [some air work], I initiated
a simulated engine failure by reducing the throttle to 12 inches manifold
pressure. The pilot started his engine-out procedures, omitting the
electric fuel pump. Because he forgot it, I pointed to it and told
him that I would have turned it on during a real engine failure.
I was demonstrating the positive effects of pulling the prop back.
I did not see the student actually turn on the electric fuel pump,
but I noticed that the pump was on. I...turned it off, and told him
to only simulate turning it on. He turned it back on, stating that
I had said to turn it on. I again turned it back off... and told him
to recover. He advanced the throttle, and seeing no power, announced
this fact to me. The engine had flooded and quit. I took the controls,
focusing on the dirt road the student had turned to during the initial
simulated engine out.
Alas, the dirt road appeared
more favorable as a landing site when the situation was only a simulated
emergency. There were obstacles yet to overcome, as our reporter continues:
- I had
tall trees directly in front of me lining the right side of the road.
I stretched my glide with the gear up. As I cleared the trees, I dropped
the gear, hoping to get the airplane down on the road before hitting
the wires that crossed the road. I touched down in a nose-high flare.
However, the gear had not yet locked down, and they folded up on touchdown.
There were no injuries and aircraft damage was minimal.
I'm certain that, even though the student spoke good English, the
language barrier helped in misunderstanding my instructions pertaining
to the use of the electric fuel pump. Additionally, we were not wearing
headsets, and, even at a manifold pressure of 12 inches, the noise
of the cockpit probably added to the confusion. Finally, because of
[the student's] high flight time and experience in [a similar model
aircraft], I did not thoroughly brief him during preflight. Had I
done so on the ground, this event might not have happened.
Single-Engine
Takeoff
A
relatively new air carrier Captain admits to paying too much attention
to monitoring the actions of an even newer First Officer. The result was
an attempted single-engine takeoff--in a multi-engine airplane.
- Crew took
the runway for departure without having started the left engine. Sound
and yaw made this immediately evident as power came up. The First
Officer said, "This is wrong"...and both pilots reduced
power to idle. We advised Tower that we would need a moment. I started
the left engine, and we reviewed all systems and departed.
Both pilots failed to properly monitor all systems, and I failed to
properly direct the taxi process. The company plans to change the
Before-Takeoff checklist [to prevent a recurrence].